(Some of this music is from our
Homexam training
videos, and
thus copyrighted; all of my autobiographical videos, however, are
expected to be released to public domain hopefully by 2012.) If you are
interested in this, you might want to bookmark this page - it's a work
in progress. (The following material is adapted from a forthcoming
autobiography, From
Fundamentalism, Through Atheism, Toward Realization, by
Larry Reavis, Ph.D.
Who Does
Write the Lines? I
wrote this many decades ago after a failed teenage romance. I'll spare
you the first verses, but perhaps you might find the last verse
interesting. After writing the first words, "Sun dips in the
sea, the wind is blowing; lights come on, the curtains rise," I almost
scratched them out; I wanted
to replace them with words that meant something. But I didn't; I felt
that maybe they did mean something that I didn't understand, so I kept
them - they just felt
right.
A few years later I
was sitting in an Army library in Korea reading a book by Carl Jung. He
was explaining something about what he called the "collective
unconscious." Among the examples he gave in support of this notion, he
mentioned a number of cultures that symbolize the sun as the male, and
of the sea, the female. Instantly I
remembered the words to my song that hadn't made sense when I wrote
them. Upon reflection, I could not doubt the accuracy of Jung's
interpretation -
obviously, my lyrics had to do with procreation. But I had doubts
regarding the source. Instead of getting those images from some
collective unconscious, I speculated that - more likely - the images
came to me from instinct - much like the source from which the bird or
the lizard shown in
the video probably get most of their smarts. (If you don't
have a
broadband web connection, download
and open later.)
Illusion About 13 years later, a song came to me
as I slept,
complete with words
to the first verse. I immediately awoke and sang the song into a tape
recorder. While still under the influence of the dream, I added a
second
verse. Again, I was rather taken aback at the words "Illusion, my love,
please don't let me see . . ." for I considered myself a level-headed
atheist with no reason at all to indulge in illusions. (Dial-up
connection? Click here.)
Shall We Gather at the River On a hot afternoon in July,
1864, a song came to a preacher by the name of Robert Lowry as he "was
lying on a lounge in a state of
physical exhaustion." That song was "Shall We Gather at the River," one
of my father's favorite hymns - and mine too, at about the same time
that I wrote "Who Does Write the Lines." Lowry's lyrics come from
Revelation 22:1-2: "A pure river of water of life, clear as
crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God . . . "
Years after I
wrote the above two songs, I read from a variety of sources
that
the
"river" is the stream of energy that pours from spirit and floods all
of creation - much like Jung's collective unconscious. In
ancient
yogic philosophy, this energy from the cosmos
comes from the sun and other sources and enters the body via
the skin and
especially the "mouth of God" - the medulla
oblongata in the brain stem (which forms one pole of a binary system
with the spiritual eye in the front-center area of the brain). From
there it is stored in the cerebrum,
to be dispersed to the lower five energy centers in the spine - which,
along with the two higher centers in the brain, the cerebrum and
medulla oblongata/spiritual eye system - are referred to as
the
"seven golden candlesticks" in the Bible (see Revelation 1:12).
This creative energy is also spoken of in the
Hebrew Bible, ". . . He might
make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by every word
that proceedeth out of the mouth of the LORD doth man live"
(Deuteronomy
8:3); Jesus is reported to have said the same in Matthew 4:4. The same concept is
translated from the
Hebrew Rouch
and the Greek pneuma
as "Holy Spirit" or "Holy Ghost," and are related to the Latin inspiration,
which also can be translated either as the "inflow of
breath" or "creative spirit." Ancient texts from India, and
other
sources, further claim that one can live without eating when one is
able to consciously
direct that energy into the body.
The Roman Catholic nun,
Therese Neumann, reportedly lived from
1923 until her death in 1962 by
light flowing in through the glass-roofed room specially
built for her and by the small wafer and sip of wine given
during mass.
(Although urine tests conducted in 1928 caused some to doubt her
claims, Yoganandaji
visited her and personally attested to the truth of her story.) Many
Indian yogis, such as Giri Bala, who also lived in the 20th century,
reportedly lived without eating.
It is said that this energy often is referred to
as the "word" (logos,
equally well translated as "the sound" *)
or "the sound of
many waters" (see Revelation 1:14, for example) because of how it
sounds to
meditators when in a deep state of meditation.
The word typically is pronounced as a slowly spoken aum by a yogi, or ah-men when spoken
by traditional Judeo-Christian congregations; the Muslims pronounce it amin, the Tibetan
Buddhists say hummm,
etc. In the fundamentalist church of my youth, we pronounced it "amen,
brother!" - with the "a" rhyming with "hay." The ancient Indians say it
consists of five currents (once it enters the body),
among which prana
and apana
are most prominent; the Chinese simply refer to it as Qi once it enters
the body. Modern physicians, such as the cardiologist Mimi Guarneri,
M.D. (in her book The
Heart Speaks), and others who think along these lines
refer to it as "life force."
Whether inside or outside the body, it is said to
be the intelligent vibration that is the creator of matter and the
vehicle of consciousness (or "intelligence" or "wisdom") - according to
Paramahansa Yogananda on p.
1585 of his Second
Coming of Christ
(see the definition given for Holy Ghost on that page). The basic
premise of string theory - which holds that the source of
all matter is tiny vibrating strings - is similar to the description
given to the the aum vibration by ancient sources. Other physicists who
wrote before string theory was popular,
such as Wolfgang Pauli (Nobel prize, physics, 1945), also saw a
correspondence between quantum
physics and a universal consciousness (he published, with Jung, The
Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche; also go
to www.psychovision.ch/synw/pauli_parapsychology_p1.htm),
as did Robert Oppenheimer ("father of the atomic
bomb") - who was so
taken with ancient Indian wisdom that he mastered Sanskrit (Oppenheimer
even quoted a verse from the Bhagavad Gita when the first atomic bomb
was exploded - see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8w3Y-dskeg).
Although most physicists scoff, scores of
other physicists, including other Nobel prize winners (e.g.,
read
Brian Josephson's position here),
agree with this view. For reasons that
exceed the scope of this venue, I now concur with Jung's notion of a
collective unconscious, and I see it as essentially similar to the
Biblical and yogic concepts described above and to concepts being
developed beyond quantum physics. I attribute both of the above two
songs to that cosmic intelligence/wisdom that was attempting to expand
my understanding - in the same way that it was working through Robert
Lowry and is always working through each of us. (Dial up: click here.)
*Note: According to footnotes in Yoganandaji's The Second Coming of Christ
(p. 10), the tendency of most churches to identify logos
with Jesus is at variance with the understanding of the earliest
Christians. For example, according to John Patrick, in his book Clement of Alexandria,
"Clement repeatedly identifies the Word with the Wisdom of God"
(perhaps today we would say "consciousness of God"?). Similarly, Dr.
Ann Pasquier in her The
Nag Hammadi Library After Fifty Years states
"Philo, Clement of Alexandria, and Origen . . . all associate the Logos
with the word of God in the Old Testament accounts of the creation . .
." And, she continues, "The Valentinians do likewise . . . According to
the Valentinians, the prologue to John's Gospel depicts a spiritual
genesis, the model for the material one, and it is seen as a spiritual
interpretation of the Old Testament accounts of the creation."
The
"prologue to John's Gospel" that she is referring to is of course the
first verses that read "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was
God . . . All things were made by Him. . ." The "Him" in that sentence
refers to a personification of Gods' wisdom - a personification that
was common among Jews like John at that time and earlier. For example,
Karen Armstrong in her A
History of God: The 4,000-Year Quest of Judaism, Christianity and Islam
states "The author of the Book of Proverbs . . . personifies wisdom so
that she seems a separate person" (see Proverbs 8:12 - "I wisdom dwell
with prudence . . ."; also see 8:22-23, 30-31).
Riff No
fancy graphics here; not much story either. . . just playing something
I
put together in the early 70s. Hope you enjoy it. (Click here
to download to hard disk.)